Countries Continue to Pursue Efforts to Increase Transparency in Investor-state Dispute Settlement
In New York last week, a large number of countries, both developed and developing, strongly supported concrete options to ensure transparency in investor-state arbitrations.
However, some delegations continue to actively block progress on these important efforts to improve UN arbitration rules.
A set of procedural rules commonly used to govern investor-state arbitrations was created by a United Nations body, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), in 1976. In 2008, in response to mounting concerns regarding how these arbitration rules developed by UNCITRAL keep investor-state arbitrations removed from public view, UNCITRAL took action to remedy the situation.
In particular, UNCITRAL formally agreed on the importance of ensuring transparency in investor-state dispute arbitrations and mandated a working group to draft a legal standard that would open those cases up to the public. The working group initiated its work on this issue in 2010, and had its fourth session on the topic during the week of February 6-10, 2012. During that meeting, draft arbitration rules on transparency were strongly supported by a large number of developed and developing countries. However, progress stalled after some countries who attended the working group's session insisted that disputes arising under existing treaties be exempt from the new transparency rules.
You might also be interested in
Why the Energy Charter Treaty Modernization Doesn't Deliver for Climate
The Energy Charter Conference adopted the "modernized" Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) on December 3, 2024. IISD's Lukas Schaugg explains what the modernization does, when it will enter into force, its tension with EU law, and why the reformed ECT can still hinder climate policies.
The Responsible Agricultural Investment Tool for Agribusiness and Case Studies
This report summarizes a collaboration to support agribusinesses in complying with principles of responsible investment in agriculture and food systems.
The double-standard in investor-state dispute settlements
Countries, especially those in the Global South, have signed investment treaties to lure foreign investors. These treaties often contain investor-state dispute settlement provisions that lead to governments being sued by foreign investors.
Stabilization Clauses: The hidden provisions that can hinder tax and investment policy reform
Stabilization clauses should no longer automatically be included in contracts between states and investors. If they are, they should, at a minimum, build on the latest international standards on stabilization to avoid being a barrier to sustainable development.