Government Support to Proposed UK Nuclear Power Station Carries Big Risks to the British Public
A review of subsidies offered to a proposed nuclear power station, Hinkley Point C, finds the British public on the verge of paying billions of pounds to support the project—and potentially much more if it fails to deliver.
GENEVA—March 9, 2016—A review of subsidies offered to a proposed nuclear power station, Hinkley Point C, finds the British public on the verge of paying billions of pounds to support the project—and potentially much more if it fails to deliver.
The findings come on the back of the resignation of Thomas Piquemal, Electricity De France’s finance director, over concerns that the project could threaten the energy firm’s financial stability.
“Hinkley Point C is a risky project for EDF, but even more risky and expensive for Britain,” said Richard Bridle, a researcher at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, and the author of the study.
The most costly subsidy is a guaranteed price for the electricity generated by Hinkley Point C. Under current proposals, the UK Government has agreed to pay nearly double the current market price for electricity for 35 years.
The UK Government has also proposed the extension of GBP 17 billion worth of loan guarantees to the project. In the event of the project failing, due to overruns or technical problems, the government could therefore be liable for the bulk of the project’s debts. EDF’s apparent concern with the economics of the project indicate that this is a real possibility.
“Every pound invested in Hinkley Point C means less to invest in other technologies, particularly for renewable energy, which are much less risky and can be financed without so many open-ended commitments,” said Mr. Bridle.
Read the story here:
Read the full report here:
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
The Cost of Fossil Fuel Reliance
Government support for fossil fuels reached at least USD 1.5 trillion in 2023, new data shows.
Increased Support Needed to Achieve India's Clean Energy Goals
India is on track to achieve many of its 2030 clean energy goals but needs to step up government support measures to accelerate the deployment of offshore wind, electric vehicles, and green hydrogen, according to a new report.
Ending Export Credits for Oil and Gas: How OECD countries can end 2024 with a climate win
For a year now, Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OECD) governments have been negotiating an agreement that could put an end to oil and gas export finance. Following the acrimony in Baku, this would be a very real way for the OECD to show policy coherence, respond to calls from the poorest countries to stop subsidizing fossil fuels, and shift public finance to solutions.
Fossil Fuel Production, Renewable Energy, and Subsidy Reform in Nationally Determined Contributions 3.0
This policy brief provides an analysis of the critical benchmarks and recommendations necessary for aligning nationally determined contributions (NDCs) with the 1.5 °C target.