Green Finance is a Growing Focus for China
Report on “Greening China’s Financial System” coming in April
BEIJING—March 21 2015—Green finance will accelerate the transition toward a sustainable economy in China and improve China’s financial system.
This is according to a preliminary report from the Financial Research Institute of the Development Research Center of the State Council of China (DRC) and the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), released today. The “Synthesis Report” summarizes an in-depth study to be published in late April 2015 entitled “Greening China’s Financial System.”
The full report on “Greening China’s Financial System” is being written by financial and environmental experts from around the world, including China.*
“Green finance” refers to financial institutions that take environmental and social factors into account when providing credit, making investments and delivering other financial services, such as insurance.
Over the past 30 years, China has developed rapidly to become the world’s second-largest economy. However, development has often caused extensive damage to the quality of air, water and soil in the country. Despite policies to curb the development of highly polluting and energy-intensive industries, the scale of these industries and practices continues to grow.
“Transforming from a resource- and pollution-intensive economy to a green economy is now a strategic priority for China,” said Zhang Chenghui, director general of the DRC’s Financial Research Institute and a co-author of the Synthesis Report. “Success depends on the development of green industries and the transformation and reduced importance of many traditional industries.”
“China has made a forceful commitment to achieving a greener economy,” said Mark Halle, IISD’s director of strategy and co-author of the report. “In terms of innovative policies, China is often ahead of the pack.”
Green finance is manifested in forms such as green credit, green securities and green insurance. For example, the Chinese government has put in place Green Credit Guidelines that require banks to use environmental assessments in their lending processes, and it has committed to reforming its bond market, including introducing green bonds.
However, as in many countries, obstacles still remain to a nationwide adoption of green finance in China, such as inconsistent policies, higher upfront costs and slower returns for green development projects, and divergent interests between central and local governments, as well as between government and market institutions.
“The challenges are significant, but they are surmountable,” said Simon Zadek, Co-Director of the United Nations Environment (UNEP) Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System and co-author of the report. “This report points to practical solutions that can be implemented quickly.”
The Synthesis Report—and the forthcoming full report—is based on an 18-month project, Greening China’s Financial System, carried out by IISD and the Finance Research Institute, Development Research Center of the State Council, in association with the United Nations Environment Programme Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System, and with support from the Fridtjof Nansen Institute. The aim is to develop specific proposals for greening China’s financial system, based on an analysis of current practice in China and an exchange of experience with international experts.
The Synthesis Report is available here: http://www.iisd.org/publications/greening-chinas-financial-system
For further information contact:
Damon Vis-Dunbar
Director of Communication
International Institute for Sustainable Development
+41 22 917-8848
Mahenau Agha
Head of Outreach
UNEP Inquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System
mahenau.agha@unep.org
+41 79-105-3614
*The research team included both international and Chinese experts. The Chinese team was led by Zhang Chenghui and coordinated by Zhang Liping of the Development Research Center of the State Council. Team members include Hui Tian, Wang Gang, Zhuo Xian, Chen Ning, Zheng Zheng, Zhong Ma and the research team in the School of Environment & Natural Resources, Renmin University of China. The international team was led by Simon Zadek and Mark Halle, and coordinated by Kelly Yu, with editing by Maya Forstater. Authors include Butch Bacani, Alexander Barkawi, Ben Caldecott, Stanislas Dupré, Keith L. Johnson, Sony Kapoor, Sean Kidney, Pierre Monnin, Padraig Oliver, Nick Robins, Jessica Robinson, Mariana Hug Silva, Beate Sonerud and Jakob Thomä.
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
COP 29 Must Deliver on Last Year’s Historic Energy Transition Pact
At COP 29 in Baku, countries must build on what was achieved at COP 28 and clarify what tripling renewables and transitioning away from fossil fuels means in practice.
IISD Welcomes Draft Regulations for Oil and Gas Pollution Cap
A firm cap on emissions can provide certainty for industry to invest in decarbonization, while ensuring the sector is on a path to net-zero by 2050.
Advancing Gender Equality and Human Rights at COP 29: Why intersectionality matters
There has been resistance to integrating intersectionality language in UNFCCC discussions, but Angie Dazé explains why it is a key step toward climate justice.
COP 16 in Cali Delivers Key Outcomes for Nature but Questions Remain on Funding
There were some very real wins, and the Colombian government should be applauded for the energy, coordination, and strong sense of community that they brought to the conference as well as to the profile of biodiversity. But the lack of progress on some key negotiation items is concerning.