IISD report says aligning a national GHG policy for Canada with Alberta's 40/40 strikes a good balance
The International Institute for Sustainable Development has issued a report analyzing three policy proposals currently in play to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Canada, and recommends alternatives to what is being contemplated by governments and the oil and gas industry.
WINNIPEG—May 2, 2013—The International Institute for Sustainable Development has issued a report analyzing three policy proposals currently in play to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Canada, and recommends alternatives to what is being contemplated by governments and the oil and gas industry.
The provinces, Canada and the oil and gas industry are under pressure to ramp up policy to achieve Canada's 2020 GHG emissions target of 17 per cent below 2005 levels, as controversy over the Keystone XL Pipeline threatens to limit Canada's access to the United States market.
IISD's analysis aims to bring coherence to the three proposals, as the outcome of the negotiations between the three parties is likely to become the basis for federal regulations and be rolled out across Canada.
"While all proposals on the table will deliver emission reductions at costs that seem reasonable, a 40 per cent intensity standard with pricing in the range of $40 per tonne of CO2 could strike a good balance," said David Sawyer, report author and IISD vice president for climate and energy.
"Such a policy could deliver 42 megatonnes (Mt) of compliance in 2020, at an average cost of $28 per tonne or $0.42 per barrel of oil produced," he said, adding that it would bring Canada considerably closer to meeting the target agreed to under the Copenhagen Accord.
In conclusion, Sawyer said the various proposals aren't far apart in terms of their ambition, and a compromise is possible.
"While setting a national GHG policy aligned with Alberta's 40/40 proposal won't please everyone, it strikes a good balance," he said. "Industry, the federal government and Alberta need to shake hands and finally get on with it, or we let our trading partners put a price on carbon for us."
-end-
For more information please contact Nona Pelletier, IISD manager, public affairs at npelletier@iisd.ca or +1 204 958 7740 or mobile +1 204 962 1303.
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
November 2024 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
In October 2024, 20 oil and gas exploration licences were awarded across three countries, with a significant portion granted by Brazil.
Coalition against fossil fuel subsidies expands but misses initial targets
The UK, Colombia, and New Zealand have signed on to a coalition of governments aiming to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, joining 13 other mainly European nations in the alliance. IISD's Vance Culbert said that half a dozen more countries—including "a few larger economy developing countries"—are talking privately to them about joining too.
Europe’s Dash for Gas in Africa puts Private Profits First
Europe’s demand for gas is contributing to expansion of LNG projects in Mozambique, Nigeria, and Senegal. This favours the interests of European oil and gas companies over those of African countries, a new report shows.
A Precarious Pursuit
BP, TotalEnergies, and Eni stand to profit from Europe's dash for gas in Africa, while host countries Mozambique, Nigeria, and Senegal take the risks.