World Leaders Must Play Their Part in Rethinking Trade to Help Us “Build Back Better”
While the question of who will lead the WTO is important, political leaders must also renew their commitment to working together if trade is to contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient world.
Eight candidates are now competing to head the World Trade Organization (WTO)—reviving a long-overdue debate about how trade can support sustainable development, especially now, as the world continues to weather the COVID-19 crisis and lays the groundwork to rebuild. But while the question of who will lead the WTO is important, political leaders must also renew their commitment to working together across forums if trade is to contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient post-COVID-19 world.
Today, the WTO is overshadowed by tensions between major economies, putting into question countries’ ability to find multilateral solutions for global problems. Meanwhile, the pandemic has shown how critical it is for them to collaborate on trade—not just so essential goods such as food and medicines can cross borders, but to safeguard decent work and livelihoods, and help us ensure a just transition to a low-carbon economy.
With COVID-19 sparking border closures, decreases in trade volumes, job losses, and declines in remittances, the world economy is more fragile than ever. Governments and companies now need to rethink how trade can contribute toward sustainable, equitable economies by realizing fundamental human rights and promoting human freedom and dignity. That means ensuring that trade and markets help improve respect for labour standards, create jobs, improve gender equity, and contribute to sustainable development across its core pillars.
The pandemic has shown how critical it is for world leaders to collaborate on trade—not just so essential goods such as food and medicines can cross borders, but to safeguard decent work and livelihoods, and help us ensure a just transition to a low-carbon economy.
It also means making sure that actions taken by the largest exporting and importing countries don’t harm producers and consumers in the world’s smallest economies. More equitable trade rules also need to ensure that countries can foster the resilience of their value chains to external shocks, including by adding value to their domestic output.
Achieving progress in these areas will require more than just improved trade policies and rules. Governments will need to rebuild trust and show they are willing to make the tough political choices to ensure a better world post-COVID, rather than reverting back to old positions and holding onto past disagreements. They will have to engage in meaningful global collaboration at the WTO to address the impacts of the pandemic on its most vulnerable Members, who were and are dependent on the interconnected globalized world that was largely designed to support the most powerful.
They will also have to reassess the current trade rulebook in light of the pandemic, and rewrite its provisions where needed to help ensure protection of the most vulnerable from future trade shocks, working with the International Labour Organization (ILO) and others. The trade community will have to engage more closely with the UN’s climate change talks and find creative, robust ways to tackle trade-related issues, such as carbon pricing and fossil fuel subsidies. In addition, they will have to deliver an ambitious and fair outcome at the WTO on fisheries subsidy reform in time for the 2020 deadline set in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14, as one step toward the conservation and sustainable use of the earth’s resources, while ensuring that the development dimension remains at the core of any trade negotiating process.
The COVID-19 crisis has shown us that it is more urgent than ever for trade and markets to contribute to promoting sustainability, overcoming inequality, and improving resilience. A new WTO Director-General could contribute to galvanizing collective action on the shared problems we face as we grapple with the pandemic and its aftermath.
However, achieving real change will require more than a changing of the guard at the WTO and other global institutions concerned with the governance of trade and markets. World leaders in key countries will need to agree to work together to “build back better”—and ensure that delivering equitable outcomes on trade is first and foremost when they do so.
Nathalie Bernasconi-Osterwalder is the Executive Director of IISD Europe and Senior Director, Economic Law and Policy. Peter Wooders is IISD's Group Director, Energy.
You might also be interested in
December 2024 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
In November 2024, 23 oil and gas exploration licences were awarded across five countries, with Russia granting the licences that account for the largest portion of embodied emissions.
The Cost of Fossil Fuel Reliance
Government support for fossil fuels reached at least USD 1.5 trillion in 2023, new data shows.
Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability: A landmark pact for trade and sustainability
The ACCTS pact, signed by Costa Rica, Iceland, New Zealand, and Switzerland, aligns trade and environmental policies, tackling fossil fuel subsidies, eco-labels, and green trade.
Ending Export Credits for Oil and Gas: How OECD countries can end 2024 with a climate win
For a year now, Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OECD) governments have been negotiating an agreement that could put an end to oil and gas export finance. Following the acrimony in Baku, this would be a very real way for the OECD to show policy coherence, respond to calls from the poorest countries to stop subsidizing fossil fuels, and shift public finance to solutions.