Comparing Approaches to Calculating Compensation: Lessons for investment arbitration reform
This webinar launched a new IISD paper comparing approaches used to determine compensation awards in investment arbitration with those of other international courts and discuss the implications for investor–state dispute settlement reform.
In recent years, investor–state arbitral tribunals have awarded increasingly high amounts of compensation to foreign investors—exacerbating the negative socio-economic impact of investment treaties in practice. Because of this, the approaches used by arbitral tribunals to determine compensation amounts are drawing ever-greater scrutiny from policy-makers, academia, and civil society.
One question that has emerged is this: How are compensation awards being calculated elsewhere? This webinar marked the launch of a brand new IISD policy paper that seeks to answer this question. Approaches of International Courts and Tribunals to the Award of Compensation in International Private Property Cases examines how other international courts and tribunals approach the awarding of compensation in international property claims cases.
The paper explores and compares practices of the Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, and the European Court of Human Rights, among others, drawing out lessons and innovations applicable to international investment arbitration reform.
This webinar brought together the paper's lead author, Esmé Shirlow, and three distinguished speakers to discuss the paper and its implications for the ongoing reform of investor–state dispute settlement.
Speakers
Moderator
- Sarah Brewin, Senior Law Advisor and Coordinator of Advisory Services, Economic Law and Policy Program, IISD
Speakers
- Esmé Shirlow, Associate Professor, Australian National University School of Law; Report Author
- Simon Batifort, Partner and Brussels Managing Partner at Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
- Veronika Fikfak, Associate Professor in Human Rights Law at the Centre of Excellence for International Courts at the University of Copenhagen
- Martins Paparinskis, Reader in Public International Law at the Faculty of Laws, University College London
IISD’s new research paper
We asked Esmé Shirlow about the paper and what lessons could be drawn from this comparative research. Watch what she had to say:
Interested in learning more?
This webinar is the fourth in IISD’s webinar series on compensation under international investment law, following on from:
- Damages in International Investment Law
- Valuation in Investment Arbitration: Spotlight on discounted cash flow analysis
- Compensation Under Investment Treaties: Exploring ideas for reform
IISD aims to continue exploring this topic with further webinars throughout 2022. In addition to the paper that will be launched at this event, IISD has also published:
- Compensation Under Investment Treaties: What are the problems and what can be done?—a concise brief for policy-makers.
- Compensation Under Investment Treaties—a longer paper discussing existing principles of compensation and possible reforms in greater depth.
Upcoming events
Building Bridges: The State of Nature-Based Investments
Join us for a panel at the Building Bridges conference in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the state-of-play of nature-based investments and the potential opportunities they present.
The Pivotal Role of Sustainability for Ukraine’s Reconstruction
This webinar, hosted by the International Institute for Sustainable Development and the Ukrainian Climate Office, will discuss how to incorporate sustainability into Ukraine's recovery and reconstruction plans and share recommendations for implementation.
Stakeholder Consultation of the East African Organic Products Standard
This online event will bring together key stakeholders to review new standards, discuss regulatory requirements, and identify updates for relevant policies.
Through Her Lens: Women leading change in sustainable agriculture and market inclusion
Despite the critical role that women play in agricultural production, they still do not have equal access to global agricultural supply chains on terms that benefit them.