To Terminate or Not to Terminate Intra-Regional BITs: Lessons from different economic blocs
This webinar aimed to draw lessons from different economic blocs exploring how they deal with existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) once newer mega-regional or multilateral treaties come into force.
Megaregional treaties that include investment chapters—like the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement and Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership—have been increasingly common in recent years. But what happens to the pre-existing bilateral investment treaties (BITs) between parties once they enter into a megaregional agreement?
How such “intra-regional BITs” are dealt with is a crucial and overlooked question, with important implications for investment governance coherence and the impact of investment treaty reforms. Different regional blocs have dealt with this question in various ways. Some regions are terminating their intra-regional BITs and replacing them with newer megaregional agreements; others explicitly allow for co-existence between intra-regional BITs and newer agreements; while others remain silent. This webinar aimed to draw lessons from different economic blocs exploring how they deal with existing investment treaties once newer mega-regional or multilateral treaties come into force.
Our speakers examined these different approaches to their design and process and detail the specific policy and legal implications raised, including examining: What are the specificities and contexts which lead to or can explain the approaches taken? Which approaches are likely to be the most practical and efficient way to address coherence and consistency in international investment governance? What are some criteria governments may want to consider when drafting termination provisions to address intra-BITs? What role can political institutions have in this process?
This webinar is part one of a two-part series aimed at supporting countries as they consider options for enhancing coherence and consistency in investment standards. This required addressing both intra-BITs, that is, bilateral investment agreements between them and extra-BITs, that is, bilateral investment agreements between them and countries outside their regional grouping. This first webinar focuses on the former, addressing intra-regional BITs.
This event was originally scheduled for September 15 but was rescheduled.
Moderator
- Nyaguthii Maina, Associate, IISD
Speakers
- Jaroslav Kudrna, Head of the International Arbitration and Investment Protection Unit, Ministry of Finance, Czech Republic
- Emily Mburu-Ndoria, Director, Directorate of Trade in Services, Investment, IPR, and Digital Trade, AfCFTA Secretariat
- Suzy Nikièma, Lead, Sustainable Investment, IISD
- Vanessa Rivas Plata, President, Special Commission Representing Peru in International Investment Disputes
- Yuanita Ruchyat, Senior Officer, Investment, Services and Investment Division, Market Integration Directorate, ASEAN Economic Community Department, ASEAN Secretariat
- Stefanie Schacherer, Assistant Professor of Law, Singapore Management University
Upcoming events
Building Bridges: The State of Nature-Based Investments
Join us for a panel at the Building Bridges conference in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the state-of-play of nature-based investments and the potential opportunities they present.
The Pivotal Role of Sustainability for Ukraine’s Reconstruction
This webinar, hosted by the International Institute for Sustainable Development and the Ukrainian Climate Office, will discuss how to incorporate sustainability into Ukraine's recovery and reconstruction plans and share recommendations for implementation.
Through Her Lens: Women leading change in sustainable agriculture and market inclusion
Despite the critical role that women play in agricultural production, they still do not have equal access to global agricultural supply chains on terms that benefit them.
A Municipal Perspective on the Value of Natural Infrastructure
This webinar will showcase examples the cost-effectiveness of natural infrastructure from a municipal perspective. Focusing on what municipalities need—what evidence and numbers they rely on, and what tools and planning processes are required to ensure that natural infrastructure is assessed alongside traditional infrastructure for cost-effectiveness.