Beyond Fossil Fuels: Fiscal transition in BRICS
This report makes the case for preparing government budgets for the clean energy transition in BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa).
Key Messages
- As the clean energy transition advances, the BRICS governments need to start preparing their budgets for a fiscal transition out of revenues from fossil fuel production and consumption. The clean energy transition offers alternatives to fossil fuels and thus can lead to the decrease in revenues for the BRICS governments in two ways: through a drop in fossil fuel prices and, over the longer term, through the shrinkage of absolute amounts of fossil fuel production and consumption.
- In 2017, taxes and other revenues from fossil fuel production and consumption amounted to 23.6 per cent of general government revenue in Russia, 17.8 per cent in India, 6.8 per cent in both Brazil and South Africa, and 4.2 per cent in China. These revenues should be used strategically to help diversify BRICS economies away from fossil fuels and cover the social costs of transition, including for vulnerable groups of consumers, workers and communities currently depending on fossil fuels.
- The BRICS governments’ budgets are also being eroded by subsidies to fossil fuel production and consumption. Phasing out these subsidies will both increase government revenues and promote transition beyond fossil fuels.
For the first time, this report brings together official data on governments’ revenues and subsidies associated with fossil fuels in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (referred to collectively as BRICS). It offers initial recommendations on aligning BRICS's fiscal policies with a clean energy transition.
First, the cross-country analysis discusses external and domestic drivers of the clean energy transition and what they mean for BRICS as exporters and importers of different fuels. After an overview of the BRICS countries’ revenues and subsidies associated with fossil fuels, the report discusses avenues for fiscal transition beyond fossil fuels. The conclusion presents policy recommendations. The cross-country analysis also includes an Annex with data tables and a methodology and scope description.
In addition to the cross-country analysis, the report includes country briefs on Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa that highlight the role of fossil fuels in respective economies. These briefs present the aggregated data on both revenues and subsidies related to fossil fuels in each country. The country briefs can be downloaded separately.
This analysis has been prepared in partnership with the Leave it in the Ground Initiative.
You might also be interested in
COP27 diary (November 16): '$100 billion in climate finance more of gesture from rich countries'
The 27th Conference of Parties (COP27) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, began November 7, 2022. Here’s a look at what happened on day 10 of COP27 climate talks. The draft text for a cover decision is yet to be produced by the COP27 Presidency as of 7.30 am November 17, leading many to wonder how long discussions will continue to arrive at a consensus on the document once released. Just two days of the summit remain.
South African Fossil Fuel Subsidies Hit Record Highs as Country's Energy Crisis Deepens
South Africa's fossil fuel subsidies tripled between 2018 and 2023, hitting USD 7.5 billion, up from USD 2.9 billion 5 years earlier, a new report by IISD reveals.
How Indonesia's Incoming President Can Advance the Transition to Clean Energy
With Prabowo Subianto inaugurated as Indonesia’s President, speculation abounds about the new administration’s commitment to the clean energy transition and climate targets, given Prabowo’s positioning as the “continuity candidate.” The question is, what, exactly, will be continued?
Public Financial Support for Renewable Power Generation and Integration in the G20 Countries
G20 governments provided at least USD 168 billion in public financial support for renewable power in 2023, less than one third of G20 fossil fuel subsidies that year.