Reply to Public Consultation on Canada's International Investment Agreements (FIPAs)
The Canadian government launched a public consultation on Canada’s foreign investment promotion and protection agreements (FIPAs) on August 14, 2018. This commentary outlines IISD's reply.
On August 14, 2018, the Canadian Minister of International Trade Diversification announced the launch of a public consultation on Canada’s foreign investment promotion and protection agreements (FIPAs).
The stated purpose of the consultation is to help the Government of Canada better reflect the views and interests of Canadians, industry and civil society, providing an opportunity for interested parties to have their say in improving rules and institutions that support the international trading system.
This commentary outlines IISD's reply to the consultation, building on IISD's innovative thinking on the elements of a progressive agenda on investment.
Additional downloads
You might also be interested in
Why the Energy Charter Treaty Modernization Doesn't Deliver for Climate
The Energy Charter Conference adopted the "modernized" Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) on December 3, 2024. IISD's Lukas Schaugg explains what the modernization does, when it will enter into force, its tension with EU law, and why the reformed ECT can still hinder climate policies.
The Responsible Agricultural Investment Tool for Agribusiness and Case Studies
This report summarizes a collaboration to support agribusinesses in complying with principles of responsible investment in agriculture and food systems.
The double-standard in investor-state dispute settlements
Countries, especially those in the Global South, have signed investment treaties to lure foreign investors. These treaties often contain investor-state dispute settlement provisions that lead to governments being sued by foreign investors.
Stabilization Clauses: The hidden provisions that can hinder tax and investment policy reform
Stabilization clauses should no longer automatically be included in contracts between states and investors. If they are, they should, at a minimum, build on the latest international standards on stabilization to avoid being a barrier to sustainable development.