UNIGE-IISD Lunch Series on Investment Disputes
Investor–state dispute settlement cases have significant public policy implications, including in the areas of health, environmental protection, economic development and taxation.
This lunch series aims to examine the relationship between international investment law cases and sustainable development goals and policies. It was developed by IISD and the Department of Public International Law and International Organisation at the University of Geneva.
We invite international and national policy-makers, academics and students with different backgrounds to explore and discuss selected cases.
2018 LUNCHEON DATES WILL BE ANNOUNCED SOON
Most Recent Luncheon:
Implementing the OECD Tax Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Items: What impacts will investment arbitration have? Bogdanova v. Moldova, Enron v. Argentina and others
The Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan adopted in 2013 by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) presents 15 action items aimed at reducing the ability of companies to employ BEPS practices that shift profits and taxes out of many countries to tax havens. Yet the current national and international investment frameworks are becoming a hindrance to the implementation of the OECD items.
At this October 19, 2017 lunch event, we discussed the potential impacts of international investment law and arbitration on the ability of governments to reply to corporate practices that affect the ability of governments to collect revenues. Does investment arbitration pose barriers to governments implementing these new standards? How do arbitration tribunals deal with this issue? And how could states address this issue in future investment treaty practice?
Howard Mann is the Senior International Law Advisor at IISD, and has over 20 years of experience with international investment law and arbitration decisions. He has authored numerous papers and articles on the subject and served on advisory committees at the national and international levels. He is currently leading a project on countering tax base erosion and profit shifting by investors in the mining sector for the Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development.
Read the meeting report.
PAST LUNCH EVENT TOPICS:
- International Investment Law and the Clean Energy Transition
- International Investment Law and Human Rights: Urbaser v. Argentina
- Trade, Investment Law and Public Health: The Phillip Morris Saga
- Investment Arbitration and Criminal Conduct: Al Warraq v. Indonesia
To register or for more information please contact: Fariba DiBenedetto-Achtari firstname.lastname@example.org
The Influential Amici in Philip Morris v. Uruguay: A new role for intergovernmental organizations in investment treaty arbitration?The role of amicus curiae briefs in the outcome of the Philip Morris v. Uruguay dispute suggests that intergovernmental organizations could play a more useful role in investment treaty arbitration. Read More
Can Investor-State Dispute Settlement Be Good for the Environment?Renewable energy investors have been using investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms to fight cuts to subsidies in Europe, but this short-term gain may hinder states in their broader pursuit of environmental objectives like addressing climate change and pollution. Read More