Establishing a Consortium for “Public Good” Data on the Politics of Energy Transition [ICP 2020]
Understanding energy politics is key in order to formulate strategies for feasible and effective energy transition pathways. Yet, reliable and accessible quantitative and qualitative data is often lacking in emerging economies.
This project is based on the belief that a combination of practitioner insights, academic rigor and methods is needed to encourage transparency, improve coordination and actively fill data gaps, to help civil society and governments more effectively promote green recovery in developing countries.
Background
For decades, transition to clean energy has been treated as mainly a technical challenge. But energy is also political: in supply, involving some of the world’s most powerful institutions and individuals; and in consumption, intimately affecting all businesses and households, and thereby attitudes to governments.
Understanding energy politics is key to formulate strategies for feasible and effective transition pathways. Yet, reliable and accessible quantitative and qualitative data is often lacking in emerging economies. Mostly, it is collected by development agencies under confidentiality agreements. The remainder is gathered by independent organizations—but efforts are scattered and relatively poorly resourced.
Promoting coordination and synergies between practitioners, scientists and policy actors to produce relevant “public good” datasets is key to support more informed and efficient transition policies.
Aim
This project aims to actively fill in data gaps and enable a more systematic understanding of energy politics. It will do so by establishing an international consortium on the politics of energy transition, combining practitioner’s insight and academic rigor to create “public good” datasets on the political forces influencing two thematic issues:
- Energy in stimulus and recovery programs
- Fossil fuel pricing and inequality
Geographically, the consortium is initially focused on India, Indonesia and South Africa, due to the importance of large emerging economies in determining global energy outcomes, and the relative paucity of robust, transparent data on energy politics.
Impact
The targeted, long-term impact is threefold:
- Improved coordination in science-practice data co-production;
- More informed and transparent energy transition policies at the national level (esp. in focus countries: India, Indonesia, South Africa);
- Recognition of domestic political factors in international policy dynamics.
Key Activities
The project holders intend to cover the following activities:
- A cycle of virtual roundtables leading to the production of background papers, the drafting of a joint statement and the publication of main findings and messages;
- Alignment of existing work plans and projects by consortium members in India, Indonesia and South Africa, as well as internationally around climate change discussions;
- Establishment of data production collaborations between consortium members, fundraising to upscale consortium activities and outreach to strategic stakeholders.
Project Core partners
- International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) (lead)
- ETH Zurich, Energy Politics Group
- University of Stellenbosch, Centre for Complex Systems in Transition
- India Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IIMA)
- Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), Indonesia
- Johns Hopkins University, Initiative for Sustainable Energy Policy (ISEP)
- The Policy Practice
You might also be interested in
Fossil-Free Recovery
How governments can raise money from fossil fuel subsidy reform and taxation and spend it efficiently for a resilient and sustainable society.
IISD Next: Campus Workshop Series on Sustainability
A free workshop series on sustainability to educate and empower youth worldwide with tools on policy, sustainable development goals, and more.
Task Force for a Resilient Recovery
With ideas from Canada and around the world, our Task Force aims for a resilient recovery—one that delivers good jobs, is positive for the environment, and addresses inequality.
Normalizing No New Fossil Fuels
There is no room for new fossil fuel projects under a 1.5°C global warming limit. New research explores how countries and the public can establish “no new fossil fuels” as a benchmark for climate leadership.