![The Proposed Foreign Pollution Fee Act publication front page showing thick smoke plumes escaping from industrial pipes.](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_box_portrait_mobile/public/2023-12/proposed-foreign-pollution-fee-act.jpg?h=81630ad8&itok=NzMO22QI)
The Proposed Foreign Pollution Fee Act
The recent amendment to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Foreign Pollution Fee Act, proposes charges on carbon-intensive imports. This analysis delves into the bill's details, expressing concerns about its complexity, excessive discretionary power, and a perceived emphasis on geopolitics over global climate protection.
-
Aaron Cosbey analyzes the proposed #ForeignPollution Fee Act, emphasizing its challenges in administration, the excessive discretionary powers, and its focus on geopolitical interests over global climate protection.
-
U.S. legislators aim to align #TradePolicy with climate goals through the Foreign Pollution Fee Act. However, @AaronCosbey's analysis highlights complexities, excessive discretion, and geopolitical priorities that could hinder its effectiveness in addressing global #climatechange.
-
With a focus on protecting U.S. producers, does the Foreign Pollution Fee Act truly prevent carbon leakage, or could it inadvertently hinder global efforts to mitigate climate change? @AaronCosbey unpacks the key elements of the Act.
In the realm of U.S. legislative initiatives addressing climate change and trade policy, Senators Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) have introduced the Foreign Pollution Fee Act. This legislative proposal aims to levy charges on imports with higher carbon intensity than their U.S. counterparts. The bill has garnered attention for its potential to succeed where other border carbon adjustment proposals have faltered. However, this analysis reveals complex administrative challenges, broad discretionary powers, and a focus on geopolitical positioning and protecting domestic industries over global climate mitigation.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Securing India's Copper Supply
This policy brief emphasizes the need for India to develop a comprehensive copper strategy.
Why Liquefied Natural Gas Expansion in Canada Is Not Worth the Risk
An analysis of the economic and environmental risks of liquified natural gas expansion in Canada.
Report Calls on Fossil Fuel Producers to Map “Transition Away” in NDCs
With governments due to submit the next generation of NDCs in 2025 a new report identifies five elements countries should include to reflect the outcome of the global stocktake.
Make New Fossil Fuel Projects Taboo to Meet Paris Goals, New Report Urges
Having proven that the world has enough fossil fuel projects to meet demand until 2050, researchers say a global norm against new projects—similar to the taboo against nuclear testing—would help phase down fossil fuels and achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement. In a policy paper for the journal Science, authors from University College London and the Winnipeg-based International Institute for Sustainable Development build the case for such a norm in three steps.