Investment Treaty News Quarterly, Volume 2, Issue 3, April 2012
In this issue:
Defining an ICSID Investment: Why economic development should be the core element; Pro-Investor or Pro-State Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Forthcoming study gives cause for concern; Venezuela's Withdrawal From ICSID: What it does and does not achieve; The White Industries Arbitration: Implications for India's Investment Treaty Program; News in Brief; Awards and Decisions; Resources and Events.
Additional downloads
You might also be interested in
Why the Energy Charter Treaty Modernization Doesn't Deliver for Climate
The Energy Charter Conference adopted the "modernized" Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) on December 3, 2024. IISD's Lukas Schaugg explains what the modernization does, when it will enter into force, its tension with EU law, and why the reformed ECT can still hinder climate policies.
The Responsible Agricultural Investment Tool for Agribusiness and Case Studies
This report summarizes a collaboration to support agribusinesses in complying with principles of responsible investment in agriculture and food systems.
Stabilization Clauses: The hidden provisions that can hinder tax and investment policy reform
Stabilization clauses should no longer automatically be included in contracts between states and investors. If they are, they should, at a minimum, build on the latest international standards on stabilization to avoid being a barrier to sustainable development.
What Drives Investment Policy-makers in Developing Countries to Use Tax Incentives?
The article explores the reasons behind the use of tax incentives in developing countries to attract investment, examining the pressures, challenges, and alternative strategies that exist.