![iisd_itn_march_2013_en.jpg](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_box_portrait_mobile/public/publication/iisd_itn_march_2013_en.jpg?h=5b30cb92&itok=yRqGZ4KT)
Investment Treaty News Quarterly, Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2013
In this issue:
A Distinction Without a Difference? The Interpretation of Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Customary International Law by Investment Tribunals; Enabling Risky Business: Human Rights and the Role of Officially Supported Trade Finance and Investment Guarantees; How to Incorporate Human Rights Obligations in Bilateral Investment Treaties; Remedies in Investor-State Arbitration: A Public Interest Perspective; Land Grab v. Food Security: Can Global Regulation Cope?; Arbitrators' Role in the Recent Investment Arbitration Boom
Additional downloads
You might also be interested in
New Agreement Marks First Step in Addressing Energy Charter Treaty Legacy
This is an important move to prevent legacy arbitration claims under the treaty, but more remains to be done.
A Balancing Act
With Nigeria's growing population in need of wide-ranging solutions to the multidimensional poverty it faces, a new IISD report outlines how the LNG dash could ultimately leave the economy more vulnerable to external shocks and without a solid domestic foundation.
National legal frameworks, not investment treaties, will best stimulate a sustainable economy
Countries should rely on domestic laws and wider regional policy frameworks to attract foreign investment for sustainable economic activities, concludes a report by Canadian think-tank the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Carbon Offset Deals and the Risks of “Green Grabbing”
Governments must ensure land-based investments for carbon removal respect the access and tenure rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities.