![offsets-water-quality-management-1.jpg](/sites/default/files/styles/featured_box_portrait_mobile/public/publication/offsets-water-quality-management-1.jpg?h=31f11bfb&itok=B1aDeuoq)
Case Study Research on Offsets for Water Quality Management
This case study research examines six water quality trading/offset programs from Canada, the United States and New Zealand and provides lessons relevant to offsetting nutrients, specifically phosphorus and nitrogen, in Manitoba.
This case study research highlights specific policy and program mechanisms for achieving reduced nutrient and contaminant loading and maximum co-benefits through offsets by examining six programs from Canada, the United States and New Zealand.
Offset programs allow regulated dischargers that do not meet pollutant discharge limits to offset their excess loads against greater pollution reductions made elsewhere in the same watershed. Since sources in a watershed can face very different costs to control the same pollutant, offsets can enable cost-effective water quality improvements.
In Manitoba, there are currently over 200 wastewater treatment facilities that discharge phosphorus and contribute to the nutrient overloading and eutrophication of Lake Winnipeg. Upgrades to these facilities are resource intensive, and the option of offsetting discharges against nonpoint sources in this agricultural region may provide higher nutrient reductions, create ancillary ecological benefits and nurture successful relationships between various stakeholders.
The report discusses lessons for offsetting program design and implementation based on a review of the following programs:
- Lake Simcoe Phosphorus Offsetting Program (Ontario, Canada)
- South Nation Conservation water quality trading program (Ontario, Canada)
- The Lake Taupō nitrogen trading program (Waikato, New Zealand)
- Clean Water Services’ Tualatin River Program (Oregon, USA)
- Erie P Market (Western Lake Erie Basin, USA)
- Electric Power Research Institute Ohio River Basin Trading Project (Ohio, USA)
The programs demonstrate some range in parameters such as watershed size, pollutant types and stage of implementation. Most programs have been developed as a compliance option for point source discharges through partnering with nonpoint sources. Our analysis focuses on synthesizing common design and implementation elements, institutional setup, credit characteristics, transaction costs, verification procedures, and other protocols and mechanisms.
You might also be interested in
How Can We Work With Nature to Tackle Drought and Desertification?
Drought is one of the most devastating and pervasive challenges exacerbated by climate change. However, we can work to reduce its effects through nature-based solutions for land restoration and climate-smart agriculture.
INC-4 Is an Opportunity to Address Fresh Water Pollution – This is how
INC-4 is the fourth meeting in a series of international negotiations that aims to develop a global treaty on plastic pollution that could and should have big implications for freshwater quality both in Canada and beyond.
What Is the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience, and How Can Countries Move It Forward?
With the introduction of the new framework for the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), COP 28 marked a milestone for adaptation. We unpack key outputs and set out how countries can move forward by strengthening their national monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) systems.
National State of the Environment Report: Uzbekistan
The National State of the Environment Report (NSoER) is a comprehensive document that provides a snapshot of current environmental trends in Uzbekistan's socio-economic development for citizens, experts, and policy-makers in the country of Uzbekistan.