Services Trade Liberalization and Food Security: Exploring the links in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
Food security remains a major policy concern for many governments the world over.
Global climate change, rising demand for food as a result of population growth, international food price volatility, poverty, and conflicts are some of major contributors to food insecurity. In recent years, there has been an increased recognition that barriers to trade (particularly with respect to agricultural and food products), a lack of investment in agriculture and related infrastructure, and insufficient regional cooperation and coordination are also factors.This paper addresses the potential role that services trade liberalization could play in promoting food security. Using the case study of regional cooperation pursued by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the authors argue that food security could serve as an important rationale for the Association to deepen its services sector reform process. This is particularly so given both the chronic food insecurity problem in many parts of Southeast Asia and the half-hearted willingness to deepen the process of services sector reform in the region.
You might also be interested in
IISD Trade and Sustainability Review, December 2024
This edition of the IISD Trade and Sustainability Review presents four expert perspectives on how agricultural support and subsidies can promote sustainability in developing and least developed countries.
Adding Fuel to the Fire: How export restrictions can exacerbate climate change’s impacts on global food security
Higher temperatures will likely reduce agricultural yields and production in most countries, raising global food prices and worsening food security. Avoiding export restrictions is crucial.
Britain Becomes First European Member of Trans-Pacific Trade Bloc
The United Kingdom becomes the first new member to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) since it entered into force in 2018.
The CPTPP trade deal is a major threat to public health and warrants a health impact assessment
The UK government has joined one of the world’s largest free trade agreements, known as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement on Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The CPTPP is not a new trade agreement waiting to be negotiated, but an already active one among 11 Pacific Rim countries (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam). Joining the CPTPP commits the UK to several rules concerning trade in goods and services that have important implications for health. Although the US is not a member of the CPTPP, the agreement evolved from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which initially included—and was shaped by—the US before President Trump withdrew the country from the deal in 2017. As such, many provisions, and even entire chapters, of the CPTPP are near carbon copies of other free trade deals negotiated by the US. But despite how much alarm was raised over the potential health effects of a free trade agreement with the US, there has been little discussion of the public health implications of the UK’s accession to this new deal.