Phaseout Pathways for Fossil Fuel Production Within Paris-Compliant Carbon Budgets
This new research by the Tyndall Centre at The University of Manchester reveals phaseout pathways for fossil fuel production, particularly oil and gas, within Paris-compliant carbon budgets.
-
Wealthy countries must end oil and gas production by 2034 to keep the world on track for the 1.5°C goal and give poorer nations longer to replace their income from fossil fuel production.
-
Taking into account countries' differing levels of wealth, development, and economic reliance on fossil fuels, the poorest nations should be given until 2050 to end oil and gas production consistent with the Paris goals. They will also need significant financial support to transition their economies.
-
The Paris goals leave no room for any nation to increase oil and gas production; all will have to make significant cuts this decade. The richest countries must cut output by 74% by 2030; the poorest by 14%.
There is a growing consensus that, to align with the Paris goals, coal must be phased out from power generation (its most significant use) by 2030 in developed countries and by 2040 or 2050 in developing countries. But what about oil and gas? IISD commissioned the Tyndall Centre at The University of Manchester to research Paris-aligned phaseout pathways for oil and gas production in different countries.
The report, by Professor Kevin Anderson, a leading researcher at the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, and Dr. Dan Calverley, warns that there is no room for any nation to increase production; instead, all will have to make significant cuts this decade.
The Paris Agreement requires that countries must act according to their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, meaning that developed countries must act first and fastest to mitigate emissions and must provide financial and other support to enable developing countries to mitigate. This report starts with carbon budgets published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and shares them among countries, in proportion to their ability to fund and enable a just transition for fossil fuel-dependent workers and communities.
Taking into account countries’ differing levels of wealth, development, and economic reliance on fossil fuels, the report says the wealthiest countries—which produce over a third of the world’s oil and gas—must cut output by 74% by 2030 and end oil and gas production by 2034. This action will keep the world on track for 1.5°C and give poorer nations longer to replace their income from fossil fuel production.
The poorest nations should be given until 2050 to end production, but they will also need significant financial support to transition their economies. However, even these countries must cut back by 14% by 2030, compared to today's production.
These challenging timelines arise because the 1.5°C carbon budget is smaller than many people realize. Furthermore, differentiated timelines deliver equity on their own. Significant financial transfers from the Global North to the Global South are prerequisites for delivering a fair phaseout schedule.
You might also be interested in
January 2025 | Carbon Minefields Oil and Gas Exploration Monitor
Last month, a total of 78 oil and gas exploration licences were awarded in two countries. The United States had the largest volume of embodied emissions in the licences it awarded.
"Electrify, Baby, Electrify": In 2025, governments must choose a safer world
President Trump campaigned on the slogan “drill, baby, drill,” yet, the case for transitioning from fossil fuels to clean energy has never been stronger.
International Institute for Sustainable Development Response to DESNZ Consultation on Scope 3 Emissions Guidance
This is a response to the British government's consultation on how to incorporate Scope 3 emissions into environmental impact assessment (EIA) processes.
Five Key Priorities to End Fossil Fuel Subsidies in Canada
As the G7 president in 2025, Canada has a pivotal opportunity to lead by fully phasing out fossil fuel supports and investing in a cleaner, more equitable future. Here are five recommendations for effective subsidy reform.