Energy Intensive Industries: Decision making for a low-carbon future - The case of steel
Steel remains a ubiquitous product that is fundamental to the world economy. Greenhouse gas emissions from steel are projected to increase globally.
There is, at present, little firm evidence that current differential carbon pricing policies have altered emission trends. The cost of emissions allowances under the European Union Emission Trading System is significant, however, it is less than the differences in average production costs between key steelmaking regions. Far higher differences in relative production costs could result if one or a limited number of countries decided to make significantly deeper reductions in production emissions than those that would occur from using the best available current technology.
In steelmaking, we cannot state with certainty that there is any breakthrough technology that would significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and that could be immediately deployed on a widespread scale. Furthermore, it is not clear that current research, development, demonstration and deployment (RDD&D) arrangements, under current carbon costs, can quickly develop and implement the breakthrough technologies that the steel industry will need if it is to take its full place within the low-carbon economy.
Scaling up RDD&D activities such that breakthrough technologies are developed and implemented as quickly as possible is likely to require a more collaborative approach between the key countries that produce steel. A life-cycle approach to use and disposal from upstream mining could ensure the benefits of steel to the low-carbon economy are not disincentivized. There is a need to debate and plan for the steps needed if deep cuts in the longer term are to be achieved. A "coalition of the willing" may be the best way forward in what is an internationally and nationally competitive steel market. The challenge of reconciling environmental performance while taking account of competitiveness and leakage concerns remains fundamental to how the steel sector could become part of the low-carbon economy. Forums are needed to take the debate forward.
You might also be interested in
Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability: A landmark pact for trade and sustainability
The ACCTS pact, signed by Costa Rica, Iceland, New Zealand, and Switzerland, aligns trade and environmental policies, tackling fossil fuel subsidies, eco-labels, and green trade.
Addressing Carbon Leakage: A toolkit
As countries adopt ambitious climate policies, this toolkit examines strategies to prevent carbon leakage—when production and emissions shift to nations with weaker climate policies—and explores the trade-offs of each approach.
IISD Trade and Sustainability Review, December 2024
This edition of the IISD Trade and Sustainability Review presents four expert perspectives on how agricultural support and subsidies can promote sustainability in developing and least developed countries.
Why Trade Matters in the Plastic–Pollution Treaty Negotiations
The global push to end plastic pollution by 2040 highlights the critical intersection of trade and environmental action, with upcoming INC-5 negotiations focusing on reducing plastic production, consumption, and waste within a fair and effective international framework.